ArenaNet talk:In-game talk/20070610

Biz, since you made the article, i'm asuming you made the log too. Thank you very much, there was some panic at GWO, since no log was posted there. Its good to know at least SOMEbody logged. DBZVelena | (Talk page) 13:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Any chance we will get a text version of it, or should I start typing it out? - anja (contribs) 13:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I probably missed few minutes from Gaile's logon until I found her, I did do the log on the eavning and then posted it here following day, not sure how it usually is done, still have original screens if there is any question of validity. I did glue together a neat little picture, could use FineReader to get the text out, with reservation for minor errors. Biz 14:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

If you'd be willing to use a "image-to-text" tool to get most of the text out, I don't mind correcting it. :) - anja (contribs) 14:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Done =P Biz 14:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Block

• Define "block"--"ignoring" or "banning their account"? Most traders just want to make some money off of their luck. I'm not one of these people, but I'd feel sorry for them...--Chiaro 03:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I would imagine its just diverted to trade chat or there's a penalty for not being able to talk for a few seconds/minutes. I disagree with feeling sorry for them. There is a trade channel and its designed to be used. These people are the reason I have Local chat turned off 100% of the time. First "WTB" was set to be diverted to the trade channel so people start using "W2B" etc, they are purposely posting in the local chat window. Seeing it in the wrong window is annoying, but then they also spam four lines within a second. I welcome any punishment for spammers. --SK 05:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Till now, spammers receive a 72h ban if support notices them. I would think this will also apply to the to-be-introduced "block". Der moon 11:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Block was specifically used not sure if its the same as suspending account, but until we know better use it. Biz 19:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

No More Updates

"A Guild Wars expansion after Eye of the North is unlikely, as the team will be busy on Guild Wars 2, however the possibility cannot be ruled out." And here all this time they kept, keep even, saying that GW2 is not the death of GW. --71.240.31.246 11:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect day

No one noticed that the day given for this - Saturday June 10, 1007 - is incorrect? It was on June 10, but that was Sunday, not Saturday. I'll fix it. —Dr Ishmael 17:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)