Feedback talk:Regina Buenaobra/Archive Misplaced Topics/Nov 2009
Archives by Topic |
---|
2 quick suggestions
Hey, I'm not sure who exactly to contact about this, but I had two ideas which I think would make a lot of people happy, and I don't think would be too hard to implement. First of all, I realize that it's impossible for items which have multiple uses (like kegs of ale) to stack regularly, but would it be too hard to make it so only full kegs stacked? I know a lot of people, like me, have multiple full kegs in storage waiting to be used, and they take up a LOT of room. Perhaps slightly-used kegs couldn't be stacked, but ones with 50 uses could be. Furthermore, I know the idea of a mod-and-inscription trader has been brought up before, but it's difficult to implement because not all mods are max or whatnot. How about if the trader only bought and sold "perfect" mods and inscriptions, such as 15^50 (not 14^50) or HCT 20% (not 19% or 18% etc). I think it would make life a lot easier for many people, especially those who stand around for hours in port cities spamming WTB a certain mod in vain. It would alleviate a lot of spam in those districts and clear it up a bit for people selling other, non-traderable things. Anyways, sorry for the long post, but I've just been thinking about these for a while and wanted to send them in. I know most of Anet's efforts are going towards GW2 right now, but I think these might be simple enough changes that would make a big difference. Thank you for reading! Ailina 20:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- This is what your looking for - [1]. Tidas 21:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're pretty quick on the buzzer there buddy, but Your article link would be more helpful if it was more like this: >>__Feedback:Getting started__<< --ilr 21:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, learn something new everyday, nice link code, I'll try to remember that. Tidas 22:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're pretty quick on the buzzer there buddy, but Your article link would be more helpful if it was more like this: >>__Feedback:Getting started__<< --ilr 21:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)