Feedback talk:User/M3G/Trade Chanels
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
agree[edit]
Yes yes and more yes. though i think a wtt is needed as well...- 
Zesbeer 05:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think an auction house would be way cooler. Please? Maybe? ~Shard
06:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- hahahaha that's never going to happen. as much as we wish for it and hope for it anet just wont do it i mean they needed to add a petting zoo. this is acaualy something that seems like it would be easy to do even if they just add another few pull downs for the party search window....- Zesbeer 06:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Good idea. This would alleviate a lot of chat traffic in the chat window. --Musha
Talk 02:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I prefer an Auction House. This way listed seems more complicated and less convenient. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 08:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Auction House is best - We will also get less "Price check on Magical Pretty Pony" spam too -Talamare- feedback 08:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- like i already said its not going to happen.- Zesbeer 08:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- You really dont need to say it, most players already expect that it wont -Talamare- feedback 08:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Guys, auction house is very unlikely to happen in GW (fingers crossed for GW2) so this idea is only to organize a bit more what we already have without heavy involvment from the dev. M3G
08:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Guys, auction house is very unlikely to happen in GW (fingers crossed for GW2) so this idea is only to organize a bit more what we already have without heavy involvment from the dev. M3G
- You really dont need to say it, most players already expect that it wont -Talamare- feedback 08:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- like i already said its not going to happen.-
- Auction House is best - We will also get less "Price check on Magical Pretty Pony" spam too -Talamare- feedback 08:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- I prefer an Auction House. This way listed seems more complicated and less convenient. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 08:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Good idea. This would alleviate a lot of chat traffic in the chat window. --Musha
- hahahaha that's never going to happen. as much as we wish for it and hope for it anet just wont do it i mean they needed to add a petting zoo. this is acaualy something that seems like it would be easy to do even if they just add another few pull downs for the party search window....-
- couldn't have typed it better my self m3g.- Zesbeer 09:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- ^_^ M3G 09:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm thinking it would be best if WTT posted it under both WTB and WTS instead of its own catagory, since you are both asking for something and willing to give up something other than money, if this is feasable in any way.
- ^_^ M3G
(Reset indent) "WTS chanel" That made me laugh. A special perfume channel? ^^ Aside from this stupid joke it seems that this suggestion is something many traders have been waiting for some time. Seems solid, let's just hope Joe implements it :)Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 11:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've asked Joe about it [[1]] and looks like it would be doable. M3G 08:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Some small improvements could ease the use of this feature:
- a sorting option => WTB, WTS and WTT would be groupped.
- a filter option: if I want lockpicks, I enter “lockpick” in a field and only the lines containing “lockpick” would appear.
- These two improvements couldbe easily implmeented by one guy in one or two days. Agaetis Ros
14:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
A better solution would be to allow the party search trade window to be searchable by a text filter. It'd do all of the above, and more. Additionally, it's something that's quite likely to be done in the client as a client-side filter, without involving the server. --Emkyooess 00:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
