Feedback talk:User/Rose Of Kali/Binding exclusive items to the account
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nice to see you made a suggestion page for it, as you know I like this suggestion. Copy + Paste ftw :). --
Qaletaqa Hania 18:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't realize how good it was when I first blurted it out in that discussion. Upon a second look after your comment, I fell in love. :P This, ofc, would make chest drops like mini Dhuum/Smite/Polar/Ghostly even more expensive and sought after, having eliminated the competition from the other "leet" minis, but hey, there is a theoretically umlimited supply of those, so I don't care. Yes, Copy + Paste ftw. :P
Rose Of Kali 18:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I see where you're going, but I kinda don't like this idea. What if if people just stop playing - what's left of exclusive items would be taken out of the game forever. It really is like the lottery though - if you get lucky you can strike it rich instantly. Previously Unsigned 04:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is their choice to stop playing. Still, THEY were the ones who earned the reward. And as with most things, you can't make everyone happy, no matter what you do. But I think the benefits of this would be worth it. And @Alice: there are plenty of competitive items like mini polar bear or Dhuum's scythe, and trading between players without removing or adding anything into the economy pool doesn't have much effect. What does have an effect is dedication/deletion of the minis, making them more rare, and inflation of currency (ecto), making the goods more expensive in comparison. Rose Of Kali 05:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- I was talking about people who turn around and sell their rewards to earn a sudden huge amount of money. If it's something like an art contest reward it shouldn't be transferable. The rich guy in LA sucks at art. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә
ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 18:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Rose. They should be locked to the account that won them, so they will only be in game so long as that person stays in the game and displays the item. After all, they are exlusive, which means excluded to all characters besides the one that obtained them. Who cares if they are taken out of the game forever? If you weren't one of the lucky ones that won the item in the first place, it is already "out of the game," for all intents and purposes, for any other person. --Musha
Talk 00:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- ^^ Couldn't have said it better. Rose Of Kali 21:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- ^^ Couldn't have said it better.
- I agree with Rose. They should be locked to the account that won them, so they will only be in game so long as that person stays in the game and displays the item. After all, they are exlusive, which means excluded to all characters besides the one that obtained them. Who cares if they are taken out of the game forever? If you weren't one of the lucky ones that won the item in the first place, it is already "out of the game," for all intents and purposes, for any other person. --Musha
- I was talking about people who turn around and sell their rewards to earn a sudden huge amount of money. If it's something like an art contest reward it shouldn't be transferable. The rich guy in LA sucks at art. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә
