Guild Wars Wiki:Adminship/draft E
 |
This page is a rejected policy modification proposal for Guild Wars Wiki:Adminship. (show differences) It has been unable to gain consensus support or it was replaced by an improved proposal. |
The English language Guild Wars Wiki is administered by the community. There are two types of formal administrator status: sysop and bureaucrat. This status is not intended to represent extra weight within community decisions or generally directing the wiki, nor is it a requirement for moderating or enforcing policy. Like all users, administrators are expected to respect policy and consensus.
Sysops[edit]
Sysops are users that are also granted technical access to a few restricted features (including blocking users and deleting pages). When effecting a change that requires this access, a clear reason must be provided and the action must only be performed in these cases (or else be reversed):
- As specifically noted in any written policy, e.g. deletion according to deletion policy. For this purpose, mentions of "administrative action" should be interpreted as an allowance of blocking/banning offenders.
- In accordance with an arbitration ruling or injunction.
- At their own initiative when they believe it would be supported directly by community consensus (regarding the specific change/action). If this discretion is exercised and the expected consensus is seriously challenged by any user, an actual consensus needs to be established and implemented or the action(s) should be reverted. In challenged cases that are disallowed by other written policies, the action(s) are to be reverted while that consensus is not yet established. When doing something not supported by other policies, the sysop is to have this action noted on the page set aside for this.
Bureaucrats[edit]
Bureaucrats are administrators with these additional powers and responsibilities:
- Altering the assigned groups and administrator status of user accounts based on community decisions or arbitration. This includes appointing or revoking sysops based on requests for adminship and managing bot status. A clear reason is to be provided in the log.
- The group of bureaucrats, as long as there are at least 2, form an arbitration committee, which is conducted according to arbitration policy. The committee membership for each arbitration case is determined by the list of bureaucrats at the time of the request for arbitration (so gaining or losing bureaucrat status in the middle of a case does not result in joining or leaving the active committee for that case).
- They are expected to respond to any questions about their actions from anyone, including via e-mail. Each bureaucrat is required to give a publicly reachable e-mail address (shown on the list of bureaucrats).
- If not already sysops, they are made sysops for the duration of their term.
- Bureaucrats may only use sysop powers to deal with an ongoing situation and if no normal sysop is available. Additionally, they may delete pages at any time in accordance with the deletion policy.
Selection process[edit]
The sysop selection (and reconfirmation) process is governed by the policy for requests for adminship. Other ways to lose sysophood include arbitration and voluntary resignation. One also gets sysop status temporarily during a term as bureaucrat.
The bureaucrat selection process is governed by the policy for elections. Bureaucrats are generally appointed for fixed terms of 6 months from their date of appointment, with the term periods being staggered to have a functional and unchanging subgroup during the transitions. Bureaucrats can only be removed before their term end by voluntary resignation (which may be done at any time) or by unanimous votes of the other bureaucrats (as long as there are at least 2 others).
ArenaNet is not formally involved in the administrator selection process except where explicitly specified, and community decisions may not be otherwise appealed to them. ArenaNet staff may participate in the administrator selection process just as any other contributor in good standing, but their opinions are given equal weight as other members of the community.
