Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/AT
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions. |
AT[edit]
This request is for the sysophood of User:AT (talk • contribs).
Created by —Tanaric 19:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC).
Status[edit]
Failed 17:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC) (candidate withdrew on the talk page).
Candidate statement[edit]
To echo others, I'm not quite sure what to put here. I'd hope that my attitude and actions are perceived as more important than this statement, but I'm also aware that I may not have the best grasp of current policy and technical code. However, I feel that I could make good use of sysop tools, and that another pair of hands to deal with housekeeping can't be bad. -- AT(talk | contribs) 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Support[edit]
- Support. Honest contributor, works hard, asset to the wiki, etc. :) —Tanaric 19:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Will grasp and utilize sysop tools to benefit the wiki... and that is, in reality, the only thing that matters in the RfA process. -Auron 04:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose. Nothing personal, I just haven't seen AT on the wiki long enough yet to feel confident about him being a sysop. Might be a better idea to wait a few months and try again. --Xeeron 22:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Same as Xeeron. It's better not to have too many sysops who we don't know too well, it's better to nominate only a few that we know really well. -- (gem / talk) 21:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Never seen him anywhere before.--§ Eloc § 01:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Added:Not even 500 edits. I triple/quadruple his edits easily.--§ Eloc § 01:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose ...Who? BLASTEDT 15:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Neutral[edit]
- Neutral. From what I've seen, AT is helpful around the wiki. But what I've seen is not very much at the moment. A little too early to tell for me. -- ab.er.rant 16:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. I feel the same as Aberrant, It's a bit too early to tell. -- Scourge 02:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. Ab.er.rant summed it up pretty well. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 20:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. I have to echo this, I don't really know AT enough to vote for or against. --Lemming64 12:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)