Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2010-01-16-User:Gares Redstorm

Gares is a chick? elix Omni 22:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Not AFAIK. I don't know what is funnier, the "evidence" posted here or the fact that Gares is referred to as female... --Rainith 22:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

All requests have to be taken seriously.--Dominator Matrix 23:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

If the IP is dissatisfied with me performing my duties as a sysop, they are within their rights to complain and take whatever actions they feel is necessary to remove me from GWW's service. I will say that I actually don't believe I've had any dealings with Shard, so a fanboy he is not.

If I can be less serious for a moment, I can assure you that I am a male and my fiance did laugh and check after she read that. — Gares 23:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

"And check?" Woo woo, Gares! elix Omni 23:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

That explains the few hours' wait between the page being created and his comment, at the least. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 23:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, took her a while to actually find anything. (osnap!) -- pling 23:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Ouch.. *looks down* ..my pride. :( — Gares 23:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

For the records, I think Gares is one of our best sysops (aside the size problems). Erasculio 00:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey, no picking on Gares. Statistically speaking some people will have to be smaller. Just be glad he's taking one for the team, so you don't have to. — Galil 00:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

trolls trollan trolls trollan trolls trollan... -Auron 01:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

At least you're not hiding now. — Galil 01:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm at work on a cheap ass Dell in the PC lounge. I don't sign in unless I have to. Me having to annoys the shit out of me. The comment was reverted simply because it came from an IP, even though the last few comments by Gares, Pling, and yourself are compeltely useless to this page, and none of those were reverted. This arbcomm request came from a troll, and your flippant conversation about him is trolling him right back.

I really shouldn't have to write walls of text (or log-in) to justify my comments after the bullshit you guys put here. -Auron 01:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Good thing you bothered to sign in and re-post your "troll troll" comment above, Auron, after it was reverted for being useless and wasteful. Obviously adding your sig and identifying yourself as a sysop gives you the right to post useless and wasteful shit. You set a poor example. -Ninjatek 01:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Ninja, try following this link; it's pretty obvious you need to. -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 02:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

This a joke? Dark Morphon 16:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)