Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2007-12 bureaucrat election/Brains12
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Now you make it hard, can i vote on both u and eloc? --Cursed Angel 17:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Why would you want to vote both, when you can just vote for me ;P ? But seriously, you can vote for however many candidates you want - "can add one approval vote or one disapproval vote for each candidate" - in the
nominationvoting phase (stage 2). -- br12 • (talk) • 18:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
"Someone's number of contributions does not mean a damn." - Dirigible
- Y0_ich_halt 20:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think that the contrib link is there for counting contrib numbers but to allow people to view what he's done on the wiki. -- (gem / talk) 21:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- ...spam in my user space? XD - Y0_ich_halt 21:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I think you'd be a great bcrat, brains, whenever I've encountered you on-wiki you've been very helpful and friendly :) —Ebany Salmonderiel 19:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Conflicts With Users[edit]
Have you been involved in any conflicts with users? If so can you demonstrate or explain how you handled the situation? Would you describe yourself as a diplomatic user? 122.104.231.28 16:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank your for your question, .28. However, I cannot think of a conflict that I was involved in, but if anyone else can, then please say so.
- In answer the rest of your question - I would regard myself diplomatic. I do my best not to let myself get subjective about something, but on the off chance it does, I don't let it control my decisions. I try to work something out for all involved, instead of getting personal and not think of others. Now, obviously, without a conflict to show you, I cannot back this up. Although a lack of conflict does show something, does it not? -- br12 • (talk) • 17:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- you were involved in serious spamming conflicts on my talk page D: no, j/k, i don't know anything serious you were involved in. - Y0_ich_halt 19:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Brains is one of the most unargumentative (if that's a word) people I can think of on this wiki (unless you count edit conflicts with me and y0 here). I'm not sure if seemingly little experience in the epic wiki discussions and arguments is a pro or a con for a bureaucrat candidate, but at least it's guaranteed that in the first time he'd need to resolve some sort of dispute he wouldn't be going on an F-Bomb, NPA-violating, up-for-a three-day-ban rant. Good luck, Calor — talk 21:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- hey, our edit conflict wars are epic! - Y0_ich_halt 12:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Brains is one of the most unargumentative (if that's a word) people I can think of on this wiki (unless you count edit conflicts with me and y0 here). I'm not sure if seemingly little experience in the epic wiki discussions and arguments is a pro or a con for a bureaucrat candidate, but at least it's guaranteed that in the first time he'd need to resolve some sort of dispute he wouldn't be going on an F-Bomb, NPA-violating, up-for-a three-day-ban rant. Good luck, Calor — talk 21:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- you were involved in serious spamming conflicts on my talk page D: no, j/k, i don't know anything serious you were involved in. - Y0_ich_halt 19:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)