Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2007-12 bureaucrat election/Teh Uber Pwnzer

Care to elaborate? -- br12 • (talk) • 19:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

no u. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 00:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Conceited, much? You've lost my vote. :) Azalea Ina Dorada 20:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm not conceited, I'm just awesome. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 00:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

-1 220.101.137.128 23:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Lost my vote too Cassius 18:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

U got mine, if I could vote. Stupid needing 100 contribs... --- Ressmonkey (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

How many do you have? Lord Belar 04:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

8, but 9 now :P. Working my way. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 07:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Why you havent been declined adminrunningship (awesome made up word) is beyond me. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Wins my vote. Full support.--Victoryisyours 01:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

If you have 100 contributions. High Five! Otherwise, start adding them so u can vote. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 01:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm rather surprised they tolerate abuse of the nomination system like this... ~ J.Kougar 03:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

So am I, /highfive. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't really care about joke nominations. The only thing they damage is the reputation of the users pushing them (actually it is a quite useful tool to separate serious editors from the non-serious kind). What is much more worrying is the way people propagate changing the election result by bringing in outsiders without knowledge of GWW. --Xeeron 12:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I find it interesting the established users are so threatened by a possible majority of people who don't think like them. If you feel the wiki would benefit from you and your elite wikian friends having control, feel free to change the election system. Stop moaning. 122.104.227.205 12:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear anon, let me quickly draw up a list for you:

• I do not feel threatened by a possible majority of people who don't think like me. I do however feel that the functioning of our voting system is threatened by a huge influx of people who do not have experience of editing on this wiki or experience with this wiki's users and who appear to be voting soley because of friendships on other web pages.
• You talk about "established users" feelings, without backing your statements up. Would you mind telling me how you got insight into several peoples minds to make statements about them?
• Your assumption about me being friends with "elite wikians" is wrong. That is one of several signs showing me that you do not know this wiki. --Xeeron 12:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I think this election (and all previous elections) has done nothing but show our system works, so far. —Tanaric 03:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

you're not awesome enough :P - Y0_ich_halt 12:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Hes too awesome to get votes for him, as is the way of awesomeness. =) --- Ressmonkey (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)