Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2009-02 bureaucrat election/Shard

I'd vote for Wyn though if i had enough edits. --adrin 10:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

u know what a bureacrat does..? --Cursed Angel 10:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Seeing how Shard is on a 6 week ban and won't be back before the election is over, I don't believe this nomination is valid. -- Wyn 11:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Shard gets my vote, he actually takes Anet's incompetence into consideration instead of following the rules blindly in the same manner that gold farming/spamming bots work. You wouldn't by any chance be using one of those bot programs, would you, Wyn? Besides, don't block Shard. He's got some valid points. How about encouraging the people at Anet to actually address the personal attacks? Oh, and blocking people so that they cannot compete with you in the bureaucrat election just makes you look corrupt. P.S. Don't block me. It doesn't work. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:71.174.28.118 (talk).

Since you weren't paying attention: Shard was banned before the election started. --JonTheMon 17:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

WUT WUT? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:71.174.28.118 (talk).

Sorry, it actually occured around the start of the elections, but before Shard got nominated. --JonTheMon 17:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Shard, using another IP adress to start flaming on Wyn's project page? That is low. --Burning Freebies 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Another thing i dont get is what that IP adress mentioned above. He recognises ArenaNets apparent "incompetence". If they apprently have this (which they dont), then why to you play the game they have made? Lol, he has just dug himself a deep whole. Also, he cannot accept/decline his post, because, as Wyn says, he is banned until after the election finishes. Why dont we just end the misery and put it on the declined list? --Burning Freebies 21:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

@Burning Freebies...the only IP address comment Shard has placed on wiki is his decline. But thank you for assuming so. Trust me, when he has something to say, he will not hide behind a sock.--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 08:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

What's a "sock" in this context? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.174.31.7 (talk • contribs) at 13:45, February 11, 2009 (UTC).

"Sock" = sockpuppet = a multiple account, usually intended for disruption. --Riddle 13:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)