Talk:Dagger attack

Request to merge Assassin attack chaining into this page. It is also a nifty table of all assassin attacks, grouped into their attack type. 72.74.118.9 02:20, 4 May 2010 (UTC) MedicDude

The issue I have with doing that is that the attack chaining page has a very specific purpose, to show where each attack would fit into a chain. This is a classification page, not really a usage page. I think quite a bit of the info you just added would be more appropriate on the attack chaining page instead. --JonTheMon 03:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The attack chaining page serves no purpose other than to be two tables, and I think it would make much more sense as a sub-topic under dagger attacks (It is ["Dagger Attack" Chaining] after all). I'm more inclined to have larger main topics, subdivided properly into sections, then having many splinter topics.72.74.118.9 19:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)MedicDude

The current level of information on the attack chaining page doesn't mean it's the wrong place to put that information. If all the information you just added were to be on the attack chaining page, it'd be a mostly-full article. And that page isn't Dagger Attack Chaining, but Assassin attack chaining, since some of those skills aren't dagger attacks. --JonTheMon 20:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Some of them aren't even attacks, yet still contribute to the Assassin's chaining system, i.e. the Dancing Daggers, which is a spell and one that surprised me recently, Assault Enchantments, which is a skill. Should our name for the system be reworked to reflect a higher degree of accuracy? Sorry for the short digression. --Oiseau 20:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Which is why I want the attack chaining page to remain separate, since it only specifies assassin attacks, not dagger attacks. --JonTheMon 21:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Good point. :> Also, I answered my own question and resolved that the name, "Assassin Attack Chaining", was accurate. Oiseau 21:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)