Talk:List of all warrior collector weapons in Prophecies
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Is there a reasoning for the word all in the title here? - Bex 14:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- The original reason it included the word all was because of the lists Wyn made for max stat collector weapons, since these lists include all collector weapons available not just max-stat ones. Also all the other lists use the same naming, mainly due to the original move you made here Bex. --Kakarot 14:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I probably was just correcting the capitalization and didn't notice the name. :P What if we removed the duplicated information and made these articles solely about non-max weapons? It would make it a lot easier to maintain and less redundant. - Bex 15:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- One problem with making them solely about non-max weapons is that it would remove the majority of the info from the Factions and Nightfall pages as well as removing the Eye of the North lists completely. The difference between the lists I made and the ones Wyn made, is that mine are by location whereas hers are by weapon type. Personally I find these ones somewhat easier to use when searching for collector weapons, this is mainly due to the fact that I can just select the area I am in and then see a short list of the weapons available under the various attributes. However this doesn't mean that the ones she made aren't needed since they are useful for finding only max-stat weapons available. Also mine are by game as well so if a person doesn't have access to a specific campaign/expansion they don't need to check if a weapon is available to them or not.
- Having said that a similar situation to what you mentioned occurs on the Unique Items pages, there is a list of weapons by profession, campaign and area. --Kakarot 17:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I probably was just correcting the capitalization and didn't notice the name. :P What if we removed the duplicated information and made these articles solely about non-max weapons? It would make it a lot easier to maintain and less redundant. - Bex 15:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)