Talk:Skill (skill type)
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
BAMPH![edit]
Should we maybe also remove it by excluding Category:Dev content? —Zerpha
The Improver 13:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Before i cont.[edit]
- Changing all the skill things on skill pages to redirect here, like where spell would be, but it redirects to skill, not the type that it is. Speak now, or im gonna finish the jawb. Sonic Wednesday
23:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you are refering to "description" and "in-game description" in the infoboxes... no. They use the in-game text, and should be left as that. If they use the (skill) tag in-game, then sure, link it here i guess, but if you are just adding it to clarify, then no.--Fighterdoken 23:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- To clarify, im making the Skill. thing in the description, link to the Skill (skill type) page, instead of the mechanic of a skill. It still says Skill, but redirects to the correct page in my opinion. See Ancestor's Rage Sonic Thursday 00:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wouldn't a bot be able to do this faster? G R E E N E R 00:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- yes, however, i enjoy being able to vote for the people who decide wether to ban people, and i need more mainspace edits. There arent THAT many there. Sonic Thursday 00:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- There aren't that many articles that fit into the category as far as i saw (then again, i am half blind), so it shouldn't be an issue if he wishes to do it manually. Either way, i see no issue if you keep going for articles like Ancestor's Rage, while also avoiding articles like Afflicted Soul Explosion.--Fighterdoken 00:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- yes, however, i enjoy being able to vote for the people who decide wether to ban people, and i need more mainspace edits. There arent THAT many there. Sonic Thursday
- Wouldn't a bot be able to do this faster? G R E E N E R 00:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- To clarify, im making the Skill. thing in the description, link to the Skill (skill type) page, instead of the mechanic of a skill. It still says Skill, but redirects to the correct page in my opinion. See Ancestor's Rage Sonic Thursday
- If you are refering to "description" and "in-game description" in the infoboxes... no. They use the in-game text, and should be left as that. If they use the (skill) tag in-game, then sure, link it here i guess, but if you are just adding it to clarify, then no.--Fighterdoken 23:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Cleanup needed[edit]
Any objections to splitting this ugly, useless, fat-ass table into several more sensible ones? Like, one table for skills that players can actually use (which should be the primary reason why >95% of readers come here=, one for skills they may ever see in game, and one for the rest? 
Roland of Gilead talk 22:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
