Template talk:Tonics nav

Nice list, Lemi.^^ Should we add it to the pages? Articles like Mhenlo also have more than one navbar. —ZerphaThe Improver 14:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Yah I guess we probably should, I made it after the discussion on the festive item nav bar page. --Lemming 15:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

yah, i just noticed that one, too. Being double-tagged now, we could remove the tonics from the other nav. —ZerphaThe Improver 09:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Birthday Tonics

should they get a line fo their own in the nav or perhaps just add them to the Everlasting line?09:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

By the way...

This template looks like complete balls in 1280 x 1024 resolution. --Riddle 22:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Disruptive Images

While being a nice visual addition to this template, I personally don't believe the images of the tonics themselves to be that helpful in the long run - and more or less disruptive to the structure of it. I'm reminded of Template:Miniatures_nav, where they simply have the name of the respective items, rather than the name and the inventory icon.
If there's no objections, or evident problems in doing so, I'd like to remove the inventory icons from the template in order to make it more organized. Ryuu - lol wiki 03:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm good with that (ideally, replace with •, as we do with similar navbars). PS nice job on the show/hide edit — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 04:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Centering

The birthday tonics are left-justified while the other tonics are centered. This looks a bit odd. I reckon the birthday ones should use the same alignment as the others, but I'm not au fait on table editing. -- Hong 07:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree. I did have them centered and I don't know why they were left justified again... They did just fine for me on smaller screens as well... I'm sorry that they look odd for you, but don't fret as it looks odd to me as well. Kaisha 07:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

They are left-aligned because of the classifications (common, uncommon, rare, and unique). It may look even more odd with the center-alignment.–alistic 07:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, nevermind.–alistic 07:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

They're in two separate boxes basically... I had them together and consistent with the other tonic sections... >.< Kaisha 07:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

This is from forever ago, but I was making this entire template in formatting consistent with Template:Miniatures nav. If you'll review the "Other" section, you'll see that the information is left-justified due to the classifications (as Balistic suggested). I personally thought it looked better, and made it easier to quickly determine which item came from which classification (more or less, the white space in-between the different sections and items themselves looked like kind of an eyesore). I still sort of agree with that, and I personally don't think it has the opportunity to look odd in comparison to the "Everlasting" and "Regular" sections of the template because on any given page, the sections will be hidden by default - meaning you won't see two at the same time unless you expand both. But, that's just my two cents. Ryuu  *bite* 00:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)