User talk:Chronicinability/BalthTitle
Comment Away!....
tbh I think this title would fill the gap between no pvp title and rank 3 hero, it would allow people to advance at their own pace not needing to rely on others to show how dedicated to pvp they are. Because getting rank in hero is almost impossible unless you have alot of free time,ranked friends, or can manage to con ur way in through lying :p, until one hits rank 3 or glad rank 2 (which is even harder to get). Though there would be the consideration of zaishen abuse but as it stands the zaishen cap is enough to allow use but not support this title track by itself. Quazark Zeklar 21:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- yeh with the cap which i'm not sure but i think it is 2k a day....it would take almost 2 months solid just for R1 of this track....so i think the farming isnt worth it. I've always found RA easier to get faction anyways. Closing the gap between R0 hero and R3 hero is really what we need to do.--ChronicinabilitY 20:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- I really like this idea. It's a nice way of summarizing all PvP experience. Going from r0 to r3 felt like a grind because I had decent experience from other areas, and I just needed to learn the maps. I just wonder if people would be willing to use it. I think so, Balth Faction is a pretty common requirement for guilds. skaspaakssa 14:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea. This effectively shows how long you have PvP'd, and would help eliminate the grind from r0 to r3.--John deathblade 02:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- I really like this idea. It's a nice way of summarizing all PvP experience. Going from r0 to r3 felt like a grind because I had decent experience from other areas, and I just needed to learn the maps. I just wonder if people would be willing to use it. I think so, Balth Faction is a pretty common requirement for guilds. skaspaakssa 14:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I got almost the same idea... ______ of Balthazar might be a good name though. And you should probably remove those category tags, they're showing up in the title categories. 220.101.137.117 07:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Earned vs Spent?[edit]
Is this title suggestion based on balth factions earned or spent on unlocking? If this is based on earned factions then how would a person who reached their cap & unable to unlock more be able to gain more balth factions to progress the title? One solution might be based on max balth faction cap but then a person would need to be dedicated to HA for hero title,HB for commander,champion for hi-end GvG, and RA/TA for Gladiator.--Bane of Worlds 17:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- There is always something to spend you're faction on...even if you just fill storage with Tourny Tokens. --ChronicinabilitY 17:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, I'm assuming many people would be giving Tourny Tokens away if this is implemented :) I'm sure I wouldn't want to fill up my storage with those :P--Bane of Worlds 17:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Truly doesn't have an e in it.[edit]
- ) --Lemming64 17:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Happy? =P lol --ChronicinabilitY 17:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Names[edit]
Well first of this page has died down a bit. Anyway.. I think it's best for all titles to keep a certain name in the title so with this one the obvious name is 'Balthazar' but.. he's a god, so the names are pretty lost. I reckon the way to get ANet to implement this is to make a name that can be used.. but doesn't make you a god at r1.. now im stuck for ideas personally, but as it's PvP perhaps ANet may actually add a title with the common name being 'PvP' or 'PvPer' So things like G'eneral PvPer' 'Balthazar's PvPer' (Ok bad names but you get the point.) Lt Death 16:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)