User talk:Chronicinability/GvGTitle

Views?

People...share views!...? --ChronicinabilitY 22:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Champion

Which happens to require being part of an elitist, hardcore PvP guild. More casual GvG players aren't rewarded at all by the current title track. 220.101.137.117 11:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

what kinda smart arse peice of sh1t put that link in? zomg I dont know why but that got me realy angry lol. :P, This title is needed, and even tho we have champion there aren't that many guilds that meet that requirement. This would never replace champion but it would be a gap between the two. Like a jr champion lol. It stops people recruiting based on how much time one spends GRINDING HA. Its like omfg just play WoW if u want to play with grinders, ofcourse alot of people enjoy grinding HA which is their chioce but its not a fair/accurate veiw on that players skill. Quazark Zeklar 18:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I like this title since it rewards more casual GvGers if this will be implemented but it should reward gvg points during vs ranked matches to keep abuse down.--Bane of Worlds 17:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeh obviously only ranked matches should count towards the title. The point is to reward the people don't gvg enough to get top 90, but are active and experienced GvGers. --ChronicinabilitY 17:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Definately a nice idea to have. I myself am like you Chronicinability in the fact that i really hate HA, but cant get into a really guild atm because of only being R3 (worse then you actually :P ). With this title if it were to be implemented, there would be a way to show GvG experience at no cost to the current game.--John deathblade 02:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)