User talk:Lacky/Archive/June 2009

Thief!

Stealing my list of questions for bureaucrat nominees, are we? ;) *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Lovely copypasta. --Burning Freebies 13:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Nom nom nom, very tasty pasta. =P Besides, it's not like they are all yours, you yourself said that they are questions that you AND other people have created. So technically, I am not stealing your questions, now am I? It's more like a general consensus of questions. -- §Lacky§ Talk 23:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

But he does own the list. --Riddle 23:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

ORly? Copyrighted and all? -- §Lacky§ Talk 23:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

yarly --Riddle 23:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

NoWai! -- §Lacky§ Talk 10:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

...

Already blocked and you can't delete a user... You basically just created some random work for a sysop and pinged the user name again. Congratulations and happy editing. Misery 16:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Eh...as I used on the talk page, I had just realised that AFTER I put the tag up...I didn't even think of the block log until afterwards. Please, forgive me, it's 2am. What? You think I have something better to do, like sleep? Also, I didn't know you couldn't "delete" a user. My mistake. As they say, To Human is Err... -- §Lacky§ Talk 16:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

WTF?

Yeah, I forgot to sign on the wtf chain once. — Jon Lupen 15:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

WTF? Ouch...that's got to hurt. =P -- §Lacky§ Talk 02:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it got a wtf? from Emily though. X) — Jon Lupen 02:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, you know what they say...better to be Emily than someone else... -- §Lacky§ Talk 02:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

User images

Please note that GWW:COPYRIGHT applies to userspace as well. - Tanetris 04:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Does it? I thought that since it was within our userspace, things uploaded weren't restricted by it? -- §Lacky§ Talk 04:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Note the fourth bullet point of GWW:USER#Content restrictions. Also note the little words on the {{user image}} template. - Tanetris 04:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, didn't see that. Also, please see File talk:User Lacky Superhero.jpg. -- §Lacky§ Talk 04:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, you've uploaded a whole buncha images tonight, so I'm going to broadly say: Unless you can honestly claim that you drew them yourself (or in the case of photos took the photo yourself), or you can link to where the person who did released them under GFDL or public domain, they're all going to have to go. So how many does that cover? Oh, and the Doctor Who screencaps (and tv/movie screencaps in general) are right out. - Tanetris 05:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

So if I link to where I got them from is that alright? Is that what you're saying? Or do the people who made/created them have to release them under the GFDL/Public Domain? -- §Lacky§ Talk 05:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, screw it, I will just link everything to the actual image url, instead of uploading the images. Any way that I can view where the images came from, since I do not keep my history? -- §Lacky§ Talk 05:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Linking may or may not be fine. If the link is to the original source, and the original source clearly states that the content is released under a license compatible with GFDL, then yes. If the link is to a third-party site using the content under the Fair Use Act, then it's not.

About the sources... check your browser historial? If you don't know where you got them, hardly will we know :P

(added) Ow, a plain link (without uploading the image here) is fine too. --Fighterdoken 05:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

As I said, my browser history doesn't exist. I am using a laptop which settings have changed it so it automatically deletes it...I know how to change it, but even if I did, it wouldn't help. I am on my computer now, so it saves the history, but I don't have the images...and yes, I did mean linking to the images without uploading on here. -- §Lacky§ Talk 11:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Never mind...I found the pictures again. I just googled alot. -- §Lacky§ Talk 11:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Monobook.css

I was wondering about how you modified your monobook.css, Do you think you could explain how you did that?--Neithan Diniem 15:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind. I figured it out.--Neithan Diniem 19:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I basically followed a picture that Brains/Pling had uploaded and kind of modified that a bit. Good work on figuring it out yourself though. -- §Lacky§ Talk 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

New Signature!

-- Lacky 02:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

WTB font. — Jon Lupen 03:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

What do you want for it? -- Lacky 03:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

To stick on your sig. — Jon Lupen 03:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Wait a minute...do you want to know what font I am using, or do You just want me to get a new font? O.o...I don't have any font on it at the moment, so whatever the normal, standard font is, that is what it is. However, I do like the font "Calibri", however, I don't know how good it would look... -- Lacky 03:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Something like this: — Lacky Also, try — on for size instead of -- if your so inclined. — Jon Lupen 05:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

That actually looks pretty good, however, I do like the -- better. Hmm I wonder what Calibri would look like... Lacky...hmm...I think I like it a bit better than the Castellar. Sorry I can't look like you. =P -- Lacky 05:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Testing 123... -- Lacky 05:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Oops, it's Castellar, not Calibri...

Testing 123... 05:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I did put Castellar in there. X) Whoops, forgot to change over the font when I pulled pieces from my sig. — Jon Lupen 05:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Hehe. Also, -- Lacky looks better than — Lacky I think. -- Lacky 05:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)