User talk:Loves to Sync

hello and RAWR

Hello there, although I understand your desire to add that information concerning RAWR, that really isn't what the guild articles are for, it's more place of self documentation for the guilds as per the policy on guild pages. Thus the addition of information in this manner is just going to result in a revert war. Thus to prevent disruption to that page and the wiki, could I respectfully ask you not to add that information on the main page again. However as a side point, their is nothing preventing you from adding this information to the talk page and asking them if they want to enter it into the main page. Regards -- Salome 15:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey there

Just wanted to say that you should not let the votes and comments on your bureaucrat election page get you down. The community can be quite xenophobic when it comes to accepting new users, it really is nothing personal. Continue contributing and get to know the community, and if you really want to become a bureaucrat, you'll get there, eventually. It needs time and dedication. And remember, the wiki isn't as hostile as some folks make it appear to be on that page, we're nice people, really, at least most of us. People just aren't used to newly registered/unknown users running for the bureaucrat seat, and such things can lead to not-so-nice reactions. Keep up the good work, and if you have any questions regarding how the wiki-code, policies or guidelines work, feel free to leave a message here or on my own talk page. :) — Why 18:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Although I agree wholeheartedly with Why's suggestions, I would also further add that gaining at least a passing familiarity with what in fact a bureaucrat does and the policies in operation on this wiki, would also be beneficial in helping you garner support in the future. -- Salome 01:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Passing curiosity

Oppose because of deadly language in your candidate statement. Loves to Sync 15:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Care to be more vague? explain? --Riddle 16:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Can I Request...

That you refrain from posting obnoxious and irreverent comments in areas where other people are trying to have legitimate discussions? I'm talking about edits like this, this, this, this, and this, and possibly others. I don't know if you think you're being funny -- heck, for all I know, you think you're really contributing to those discussions -- but, personally, it's been getting on my nerves, and as far as I can tell, you're not actually contributing anything to those discussions. *Defiant Elements* +talk 03:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Your nerves? What about the people that is affecting him? And anyway, why would Salome be bitter over your opposition? Your a troll(talking to sync here), and we all hate trolls, so please stop trolling, even though your votes arent affecting the election in the slighest. --Burning Freebies 09:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, i think he is just trolling because he got rejected in February. Most people who get rejected usually start to become more serious, eg Lacky who is using copypasta on all candidate pages. So please dont troll because of this. --Burning Freebies 09:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello

How are you today? Misery 19:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

^bump. Misery 13:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Now I'm curious too. How were you on the 25th of June? -- Dashface 03:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Are we still curious how he was on the 25th of June? -- Salome 12:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I am. Misery 13:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Given that the information is being withheld, my curiosity has only grown. -- Dashface 07:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I love you too

Getting ahead of yourself here? -- riyen ♥ 00:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

LtS: Next time, be more subtle, and get banned before the nomination phase so your name isn't on the list. ~Shard 00:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Curious

I'm curious how you feel my comment to KJ in the discussion about removing the "wiki as a forum" mentality on staff pages in any way indicates I "has a lack of understanding as to how a wiki operates". I know exactly how a wiki operates, or should operate anyway. Talk pages are for discussion regarding the associated page content, or in the case of use talk pages and staff feedback talk pages, they are to communicate with that user. The entire discussion on the noticeboard talk page is in regards to the many people who treat Regina's talk page as a forum, open for community discussion of game issues, and KJ is a prime example of a user doing that. Those discussions amongst users with little or no participation from Regina do not belong on her talk page, they belong on a fansite forum somewhere, or on a feedback talk page if a suggestion for change is being made. And this is NOT my idea, I'm simply participating in the discussion. -- Wyn talk 21:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to be left out of this. Thanks. Karate Jesus 21:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Do I need to be desysoped? Misery 20:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

:/

grow up bro -Auron 20:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

nou--71.193.48.146 20:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)