User talk:Xeeron/suggestions/New title: Universal protector of

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

"Server/database capacity , but could be solved when the japanese/korean servers gets offline and added to the server park for US and Europa. Few people playing imo on these servers. "

lololololo, pwned by Korean skillz in PvP lately? Vili User talk:Vili 10:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
"hay guise, i made a lot of karakters and think i shewld be rewurded for grindan" --Jette User Jette awesome.png 11:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

When starting deleting things from the original suggestion, that's something disrespectfull for the original poster. Please correct it, thanx. Didis 11:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Uh...No, it's not disrespectful. That's how the wiki works: your contributions don't belong to you, they belong to the wiki. Suggestions in the Arena Net space may be edited by anyone; the main Suggestions page clearly states that "Like any page on the wiki, ideas are put up to be collaboratively edited to be easily read and understood by ArenaNet". The only way to prevent your suggestions from being edited is by making them in your userspace and linking to them from the List of personal ideas article. Erasculio 11:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Ah well...tried to edit my original post but then it was already altered. Yes you are right, but then...collaboration is also possible when the second person sees the first notes and not to have to open the history. Something which imo could be better on the wiki. Is deleting befor actual discussing the correct way? In my oppinion the remark about the grinding is not correct...it does not say anything about the "not possible" question asked. Didis 12:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Ehm Guild Wars want to make money so there is an opportunity people are actual buying characters slots again. Didis 12:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Um, adding comments to the bottom are not something that should be collaboratively edited, those are people's responses to the suggestion. Feel free to add countering arguments in the appropriate place. On a different note, I don't think this is a very viable suggestion. Many people don't have the extra character slots, and forcing them to purchase them just for another grind based title is not really in the spirit of Guild Wars. --Wyn's Talk page Wyn/talk 12:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
How is repeating the same time consuming task 10 times not grind? You confuse me Didi. Misery 12:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Because people going to help others (again), resulting being helped for your own benefit. And yes Guild Wars is a CORPG (Competitive Online Role-Playing Game), resulting in little bit of a competition in the PVE-world for those who will acchieve the title first. No harm done... Didis 15:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Reworked it to prevent much discrimination. Players like didis should think about discrimination and about it's possible effects to discriminated players. If the previous shit was implemented (only with character slots) GW would have achieved a VERY BAD reputation. Boro 10px‎ 14:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)