User talk:Auron/MBTI
Results[edit]
Auron is INTJ.
INTP -- Brains12 \ Talk 16:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
INFJ :) - anja 16:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ -- (CoRrRan / talk) 16:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
ISFP, srsly :/ --Cursed Angel 17:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- You sure? - "They are likely to be kind, gentle and sensitive in their dealings with others.", "ISFPs tend to be quiet and reserved" :P -- Brains12 \ Talk 17:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- nearly everything on that page is me when im not sitting in front of a computer talking with ppl i really dont know on a videogame wiki under a name like Cursed Angel --Cursed Angel 17:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Nice to know there's someone behind the pseudonym :D -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- :D --Cursed Angel 20:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Nice to know there's someone behind the pseudonym :D -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- nearly everything on that page is me when im not sitting in front of a computer talking with ppl i really dont know on a videogame wiki under a name like Cursed Angel --Cursed Angel 17:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
INTJ :) poke | talk 17:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
INTJ --Doll 17:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
ISTJ --Sum Mesmer Guy 17:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
ENFJ (kinda right, but in some places wrong) --Shadowphoenix 17:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
ISFP Kind of right, yeah. -- Mini Me 20:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
INFP --Ufelder 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
INFJ. Rather true. —Nova 23:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
ENFP. I wasn't terribly surprised. *Defiant Elements* +talk 03:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
INTJ. Lord Belar 03:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
ISFJIs kinda true ._..--Shadowsin 07:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
ISTJ. Lord of all tyria 17:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
TROLL. What the... ? #@%$ Yseron - 90.48.7.10 17:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ. --Gummy Joe 17:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ. - (snō hwīt tăn) [sic] 12:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
ENTP -- Well that was a forgone conclusion really seeing as its also labeled "the lawyer" and I am a lawyer. God i feel like such a stereotype. -- Salome 12:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
INTJ, apparently.- Vanguard 12:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Over a year later, I have drifted towards ISTJ. From a Scientist to an Inspector.-- anguard 19:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
INTJ here, too. Bugger. -- NUKLEAR IIV 23:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
ISFJ, it seems. Kokuou 22:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
INTJ So not surprised :). Thank you! -- Silverleaf 10:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ Mohnzh say what? 20:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Apparently I'm ISTJ. /shrug --71.229.204.25 02:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
ISFJ Invincible Rogue 21:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ Apparently. --People of Antioch 00:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
TROLL owut --Disrupt Shot! 00:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
INTP Twiggie 16:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
INTJ Mango 18:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
INFP — Skakid 01:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
ISTJ, I wonder how the letters are ordered? I scored 67 for introverted, 1 for sensing, 88 for thinking and 1 for judging. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 08:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- The letters are order in 4 categories: [I]ntrovert/[E]xtrovert, [S]ensing/i[N]tuitive, [F]eeling/[T]hinking, [P]erceiving/[J]udging. I know it's a bit late, but it doesn't hurt to add it. ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
ESTJ, but so is George W. Bush apparently! :( --Lemming 15:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
ENTJ, accurate, except for the fact that I do not lack patience :P — Why 07:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
ENTP, accurate and inaccurate, way to be vague psychology. Misery 23:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
INTP--Simpson man 23:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
ISTP--Crimmastermind 01:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
INTJ, as much as it pains me in this context. — Wolf2581 (contribs·talk) 06:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
ESFJ. O.o Dominator Matrix 09:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
ISTJ Most parts are true. MagnusTalk| 10:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
ISTJ ~ Kurd 21:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
ISFP, "The Artist". (Why do we get along?) I was dissatisfied with many of the survey questions :\ "...likely to not give themself enough credit for the things which they do extremely well" is particularly apt, though. Addendum: taking the test again without factoring in my "Wiki personality", I'm apparently an ISTP, or "Mechanic". Which makes me sad. I don't think the test is especially great measure of me. (Then again, why would it be?) Vili 04:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
ESFP. Vili 点 00:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
INTJ - The Scientist, as I expected - Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
INFJ Kyos 23:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
ISTP 1337H4AX0RK1NG 01:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
ENTJ --Readem 15:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
INTP 82.34.128.19 15:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
ENFP Laurielegit 17:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
ESTJ --JonTheMon 18:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
INFJ Introverted 22%, Intuitive 25%, Feeling 12%, Judging 22%
- You are:
- slightly expressed introvert, moderately expressed intuitive personality,
- slightly expressed feeling personality, slightly expressed judging personality.
- Famous people of your particular type:
- John Bradshaw, Mother Teresa, Nelson Mandela, John Calvin & Nicole Kidman.
- Woah, interesting... Longshot Hammerhand 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
INTJ"INTJs are natural leaders, although they usually choose to remain in the background until they see a real need to take over the lead." - Wow, this is extremely applicable, I was surprised to find something that accurate. Lyra Valo 20:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
ENTJ - Giant Nuker 11:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
INTJ - Alex Eternal 09:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
ENFP — Ebañy Salmonderiel 18:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
ENTJ ··· danny 22:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
ENTP ~Shard 22:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
INTJ DarkNecrid 15:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
INTJ -FireFox 19:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
ENTJ Raine - talk 20:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
ISTJ Ciel 10:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
INTP File:User Moo KittyMoo.jpg 19:45, 6 July 2009
INTP, interesting. Athrun (bigfail) 14:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
INFP, the best choice. That perfectionist part is so me :D
After i read these again, it's 50/50 between INFP and ISFP. Both have many abilities i have. After i did the test, it said i'm INTJ which clearly isn't me O.o
- Ok, i did the test again, thinking each question before i answered. And this time it gave me the damn ENTJ! Wtf? - J.P.Talk 21:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
ISTP.. but that's not really like me :/ – Emmett 04:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
ISTP ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 01:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
INTJ o yh this is awsum - Wuhy 04:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
INTP Qaletaqa Hania 12:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
INTJ apparently Ganon 12:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
ESFJ apparently? o.O Odd, as I hate structured environments. Does this make me a CareBear? Elysea 14:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- yes. ··· Danny Pew Pew 16:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. Am I supposed to be upset about this? Elysea 18:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
INTJ Titani Ertan 19:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
ENFP Karate Jesus 19:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
INFP , Mostly correct but I'm able to understand logic stuff.Quite easely actually xD Lilondra 21:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't delude yourself over the logic part, thanks. Pika Fan 21:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
INFP Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
56 88 12 67
Pika Fan 21:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not deluding myself.If you have no clue what you're talking about then shut up ? In case you didn't know being able to think logic has little to do with GW Lilondra 05:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- If you wanna know why I have this "illusion" Its generally because I have trouble studying anything that doesn't seem logic to me.Maths or science takes me about 30 mins for a test to get good results,Languages take me ALOT more (yay ADD FUCK).If I'm wrong I'm pretty sure Its because I failed to comprehend the context of Logic (is that logical ?) and not because I'm not logical. Lilondra 05:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
ISTP --Sage Talk 15:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
ENTP --The Scythe Has Fallen Ω|Ω talk Ω|Ω 21:00, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
INTJ --hnzdvn 20:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
INTJ --h. moo. 21:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
ISTP X ip 23:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
ESFJ, what a joke. →[ »Halogod (talk)« ]← 09:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
ESTJ, I think it's about right really. --Frosty 10:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Ah em....[edit]
.... --Shadowphoenix 17:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- ???--Sum Mesmer Guy 17:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes? -Auron 05:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh nothing... >.> --Shadowphoenix 05:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- So why did you post? <_< -- Mini Me 15:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Someone thinks their turf is getting stepped on? --Ufelder 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Slash agree. Not much to do about it, though. -Auron 14:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Out of interest, what's your MBTI result? -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- auron's INTJ --Blood Anthem 14:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Out of interest, what's your MBTI result? -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Slash agree. Not much to do about it, though. -Auron 14:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Someone thinks their turf is getting stepped on? --Ufelder 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- So why did you post? <_< -- Mini Me 15:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh nothing... >.> --Shadowphoenix 05:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes? -Auron 05:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Auron[edit]
Post yours. Lord Belar 03:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- He's INTJ (points to comment in above section). *Defiant Elements* +talk 03:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I'm dumb. Or just not very observant. I personally prefer the latter. Lord Belar 03:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
More introverted people... on a wiki?[edit]
Interesting. -Auron 16:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- :S we need more E's, yay E's!!!!!!!!!!!!! ^-^ --Shadowphoenix 16:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- go I's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Sum Mesmer Guy 16:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's too many exclamation marks, we're kicking you out of the I's. Lord Belar 01:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- 1. u can't change my personality.
- 2. Lord of all tyria would feel lonely without me.
- 3. u don't know what i'm like in real life.--Sum Mesmer Guy 08:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's too many exclamation marks, we're kicking you out of the I's. Lord Belar 01:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- go I's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Sum Mesmer Guy 16:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
introverted people[edit]
wikis draw out the extroverted side of people (usually not the primary side), i suppose, which is why people on wikis act so much differently than they would irl. 99.235.230.36 14:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- that's cos no-one will judge them cos every1s so nice here :). srsly tho, intoverts are introverted because they are afraid of making an ass of themselves. (in my case anyway, when i was younger i was more exroverted, but i got picked on, and still do, but to a lesser extent)--Sum Mesmer Guy 18:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Accuracy[edit]
I found my INTJ descrip to be very accurate, especially when stated "INTJs spend a lot of time inside their own minds, and may have little interest in the other people's thoughts or feelings." Though I do not see myself as a "natural leader", ...although they usually choose to remain in the background until they see a real need to take over the lead. can be applied to me and makes a lot of sense to me. However, the heading is "The Scientist", which I'm nowhere near. Any other reports on accuracy? Were some of yours way off?- Vanguard 14:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Scientist isn't only a profession; in this case it describes an outlook on life. Detached, but still interested in what's going on - as long as it doesn't have to do with personal feelings :P -Auron 14:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- The article said "INTJ's would make good scientists", if memory serves. I haven't read the thing in like, an hour. I can re-check.- Vanguard 21:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- INFJ is scaringly accurate for me. The only thing I don't agree with is artistic/creative, the rest fits really well. Protector would be a good title too, I think. :) - anja 21:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- despite ISTJ being spookily accurate, i can't get my head around how you can split up all 6.7 billion people in the world into just 16 personality types--Sum Mesmer Guy contribs 18:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Humans are predictable. Lord Belar 20:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- ENTJs are "natural born leaders". As someone involved in multiple leadership positions, one of which is to even train leaders, I'm not exactly surprised. I would have been very surprised if that had not been the first statement. Mohnzh say what? 20:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- But is that accurate to you?- Vanguard 22:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Mohnzh just said it was...-- Brains12 22:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Not being surprised doesn't say it was RIGHT, that just tells me "I was expecting to be called that".- Vanguard 11:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- The MBTI is a fun test, but the Forer effect needs to be pointed out. --Ufelder 12:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's how the greater part of the 6.whatever billion people all think the test is "accurate," even though it has only 16 possible outcomes. -Auron 13:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- The MBTI is a fun test, but the Forer effect needs to be pointed out. --Ufelder 12:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Not being surprised doesn't say it was RIGHT, that just tells me "I was expecting to be called that".- Vanguard 11:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Mohnzh just said it was...-- Brains12 22:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- But is that accurate to you?- Vanguard 22:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- ENTJs are "natural born leaders". As someone involved in multiple leadership positions, one of which is to even train leaders, I'm not exactly surprised. I would have been very surprised if that had not been the first statement. Mohnzh say what? 20:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Humans are predictable. Lord Belar 20:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- despite ISTJ being spookily accurate, i can't get my head around how you can split up all 6.7 billion people in the world into just 16 personality types--Sum Mesmer Guy contribs 18:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I vote on the "humans are predictable" arguement.- Vanguard 11:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- That statement seems to fit with the INTJ description pretty well, for you and Belar :D Overall, interesting test, but I found only Y/N choices somewhat limiting on certain questions. INTP if anyone cares, and it does appear remarkably accurate. 71.31.157.150 23:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yay :P -- Brains12 \ talk 23:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- /highfive * :D 71.31.157.150 04:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Good to know. Y/N things are flawed sure, but this test was so much better than those damn quizzes 13 year old girls build during their school hours. "What kind of carebear are YOU!" I like taking these thought out ones.- Vanguard 00:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sixteen? Most personality tests have four (those are the real bullshit ones). And you can divide any number of people into any number of groups; it's just that the more groups you have, the more accurate the results are. 99.236.18.156 17:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Good to know. Y/N things are flawed sure, but this test was so much better than those damn quizzes 13 year old girls build during their school hours. "What kind of carebear are YOU!" I like taking these thought out ones.- Vanguard 00:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- /highfive * :D 71.31.157.150 04:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yay :P -- Brains12 \ talk 23:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Statistics[edit]
Last update: 04:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- According to Wikipedia.
I've compiled tables summarizing the results. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice table :P - Auron 09:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I would expect no less from a Scientist :p Vili 00:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Userboxes[edit]
Well I made a user box for Inspirers (me), does anyone want any others? I can do them, and put them here, but I don't want to waste my effort. Laurielegit 22:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
This user is an "Inspirer". |
- This talk page has 1400+ views, so people will probably see if you put them here. -Auron 04:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Honesty[edit]
I really wonder how many people are being completely honest with themselves on the test. I don't think you'd expect nearly so many executives and scientists in the population by comparison. ··· danny 17:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- One second thought, it could largely have to do with the people a wikipedia attracts. However, I do wonder if people are basing their answers off of who they see themselves as, or who they are. I took a second test and was careful look at my actions in similar situations, and I still received ENTJ, just with slightly different percentages. ··· danny 17:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did the same as you did and received ISFP, again. I don't know what the percentages of the test I did a year ago were... Mini Me 20:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Intuitive, Thinking, Judging people would be really unlikely to see this page on this user's wiki space, right? What's more, these aren't at all the kinds of people who would find this interesting enough to take the test and post their results. It's also worth noting that the vast majority of the people here are introverts. Raine - talk 23:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was my understanding that The Scientists want to know everything (INTJ), but I'm not sure about the Executives (ENTJ.). --Alex Eternal 08:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Executives, like myself, like to tell others to fuck off a lot and do things ourselves. We function minimally in collaborative settings such as a wiki and usually resort to trolling to achieve our ends. As for the idea that most users are introverts, that's actually less likely than you'd think. I, myself, traverse various wikis during my working hours due to the eerie silence that dominates the lab that I'm stuck in. Many other users lead very social lives but have very dull working days which lead them to environments in which they can be both social and productive. :> ··· Danny Pew Pew 16:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was my understanding that The Scientists want to know everything (INTJ), but I'm not sure about the Executives (ENTJ.). --Alex Eternal 08:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Intuitive, Thinking, Judging people would be really unlikely to see this page on this user's wiki space, right? What's more, these aren't at all the kinds of people who would find this interesting enough to take the test and post their results. It's also worth noting that the vast majority of the people here are introverts. Raine - talk 23:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did the same as you did and received ISFP, again. I don't know what the percentages of the test I did a year ago were... Mini Me 20:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
INTP! 11%, 62%, 12%, 33%. ---Chaos?- (moo!) -- 19:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)