User talk:Borotvaltgandalf/suggestions/archive1

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

todo...[edit]

You said that the live team talks about what to do next: I'd suggest reworking the following professions: Paragon (primary attrib, armor, dps, skills...), Dervish (primary attrib, energy management, scythes!!!), Ritualist (Spirits overall, communing, primary attribute), assassin (don't let them pack insane amounts of attack skills). If you would like to read more about it, then I'm willing to explain you every of my ideas in a very detailed way. Boro 10px‎ 17:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Isn't there a licensing thing saying you're not allowed to suggest what you just suggested? --Alex User AlexEternal Mr Bear.jpgEternal 18:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't care. this whole licensing problem exists only because arenanet doesn't want to be connected with players... it was on for about two years without being noticed. SO if you Really care about licensing issues with suggestions then revert guild wars with two years! Boro 10px‎ 14:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
note: Linsey wants to be connected with the playerbase Boro 10px‎
I'll stop you there. Anet does want to be connected to the userbase. But The GFDL [1] does not allow commercial use of the ideas. Anet is creating (soon I hope) a feedback area that we can surrender our ideas (so they can use them). Dominator Matrix 19:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I do agree with Dominator Boro...even though you have some good suggestions yourself they are in no way disconnecting to the Player Base. With the new game (GW2) and so much competition in the gaming industry, limited resourses and 6 million players to see to it is pretty-darn-hard to make everyone happy. How ever much they want to. Maybe you have a way to make large groups of players more happy than at the current way Anet is doing...I sure don't other than helping out where I can here and in-game and think a lot of personal wants in-game through before asking (demanding) things changed. --Silverleaf Special:Contributions/SilverleafDon't assume, Know! 13:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)