User talk:Elviondale/HoM

All comments not pertaining to a specific Monument or signature have been moved to and can be left at User talk:Elviondale/HoM/Random. Thanks!

Click a link below to discuss[edit]

Fellowship (Heroes/pets)
Devotion (minis)
Honor (titles)
Valor (weapons)
Resilience (armor)

Sign Below if you agree[edit]

Click "edit" at the top of the page and type in *~~~~ below the rest of the signatures

elviondale (tahlk) 20:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Isonduil 21:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
OhYo 21:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Raptors
Alien 22:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Broodling67 22:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Vhalantru 23:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC) (great idea, but they have only a week to change anything)

Ever heard of a game update? --- Raptors

Outpost (talk | contrib) 23:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC) (Completely agree. I wish it'd be complete account based, both for pets and the like, and for carrying over to GW2.)
Laura Brinklow 23:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Thor79••Talk 23:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
DBZVelena | (Talk page) 23:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Heard about this in my guild's chat, read it, think your idea has merit. Anet should at least consider the sugestion.

Midnight08 01:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC) -- Just stoping in to say sign... the suggstions basically make the HoM more personalized and accessable based on a player and not just a character - as it is now it really alienates players who put alot of effort into pve. (i havent and probably wont have much in there for a while, but i understand and see teh issues in the current setup.
Bcstingg 01:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I think all of the proposed changes are good ones. As it stands, the HoM is not a very player-centric feature and it only allows you to display what someone else has decided is worthwhile. I'm sure the secondary purpose of conferring some benefit in GW2 could be unlinked from the display. For example, it may be that only a Black Moa, Phoenix, or Black Widow would get you anything in GW2, but some people might like to display a Meladru's Stalker anyway. I think many of us were more excited about this as a way to display our accomplishments -- whatever we may think those are -- rather than to display certain predefined vanity items.
Lord Belar 02:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
-- Jioruji Derako.> -- I agree with everything. Obviously, if minipets aren't customized, you can collect GW2 rewards and then sell the pets... but at least make the pets account-based, please. Armor should at least display your own profession. Animal Companions shouldn't be classified as "elite", people choose the pet they like for a reason, and shouldn't be punished because they didn't pick one of the so-called "elites". If the only thing stopping ANet from doing all this is budget issues, fly me down there and I'll personally learn coding and do it myself for free...

~~--Torp 03:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)~~ I disagree with everything other than your "fellowship" proposal /nosign

Torp, I read your thoughts earlier and it inspired mine a bit- you want it to be account-based, correct? -elviondale (tahlk)

Yes, that is correct, U crossed out the weapons thing?--Torp 04:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I did. I'm trying to get a sense for what people seem to want and compromise with what would theoretically be easier to do. Put anything in there you want, but only "approved" items have a reward. -elviondale (tahlk) 00:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[ ALTIMIT | TALK ] 05:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
-- (Tribina / talk) 05:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
dominique · *(talk) 05:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Estoldt 05:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Шєвч [TALK] @ 15:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Teo 18:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Couldn't Agree Less
--Longasc 13:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The Great Tomato 11:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Antiarchangel 23:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Murk Raven 10:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Riallews 09:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Calor 18:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Great basis of ideas.
[~ Reaper ~] 19:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Salathus 18:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
80.132.97.42 12:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh yea i like every bit of what you have crossed out. Hope thats what Im signing up for =P--WikiWu 10:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Those are things that either have been fixed or that Gaile has mentioned will be fixed -elviondale (tahlk)

cool--WikiWu 10:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

File:ZakekxekSignatureImage.png Zakek Xek talk 17:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Pimpologist talk 18:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC) I think these ideas are great just wish I would have known about this sooner. Glad to see some of the ideas are already getting or have been implemented.
Ravenhill 10:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
For great Justice! [Mesodreth Blackwing]00:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
76.173.217.181 08:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Izkoas 12:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Rakgar: All of the remaining, listed revisions would be great additions to the hall of monuments. I would say that the weapon monument is the most notable of the bunch though. Rakgar 12:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Obsolete92 22:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
-- The Titan 01:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
nice ideas :) hope some get integrated —Zerpha The Improver 23:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Destructos Maximus 23:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
User:Foozdood 14:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Another suggestion I would like to make(I think you touched on it in one of the sections) is for statues to be more easily organizable, or at least be completely random so that you are not limited to a certain number of arrangements. Also, if they do allow different weapons, they should also offer GW2 rewards for torment weapons as they are every bit as high end as destroyer weapons.
People of Antioch talk 22:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Excellent suggestions.
— Galil 16:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
File:User Rockon Metal Jay Sig.JPG Jay 22:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Wild rituals signs this XD 17 January 2008 2.58 pm
SweetEscape 03:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Amantis 03:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
83.104.133.95 10:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Wandering Traveler 03:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
68.41.209.249 23:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
The Golden Arrow 01:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC) yes make it account wide
Warior kronos 20:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Make it account wide =D
Wizard Of Orden 01:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
87.211.164.142 08:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Dominator Matrix 08:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Chi Shan 12:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)