User talk:Shadow Runner/Archive 2
The note
OMG nooooo!! -- Cyan 10:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I should be able to find a proxy, but if not then I won't be on for aaages :( Shadow Runner 10:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I so dislike your college rules. -- Cyan 10:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- You are not the only one. It'd be great to go back to college if we had unrestricted internet or even internet in our rooms. Currently, I only get on the internet during my Computing lessons and even then I need to find a new proxy every other week. It's not fun tbh Shadow Runner 10:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Your new page makes Sanchez Upset. --Neil2250 , Render Lord 10:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- You are not the only one. It'd be great to go back to college if we had unrestricted internet or even internet in our rooms. Currently, I only get on the internet during my Computing lessons and even then I need to find a new proxy every other week. It's not fun tbh Shadow Runner 10:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I so dislike your college rules. -- Cyan 10:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Obsidian flame and energy blast.
You state that Related skills are dependent on the skills function, and I think that contradicts your revert. If anything, it's the function of these two skills that is most alike. Same cast time, very similar effect. Owoc 09:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- By skill function, I don't mean just raw damage. Same cast times are also not enough to warrant them being related. I think a 3rd opinion may be required here. Shadow Runner 09:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Cast times don't really factor in whether or not they're related. If it matters, I don't think they're related.--neshot 09:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
*Waves*
Goodafternoon =) -- Cyan 12:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Why hi there Cyan, good afternoon to you too! How are you on this fine Wednesday? Shadow Runner 12:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Because you were wondering
--h. moo. 16:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers for clarifying that. It just seemed a bit odd, that's all. Shadow Runner 16:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
dawg
you totally just violated GWW:1RR. in the future please do not revert something more than once. Cynn's Thong 16:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- The image serves no actual purpose on the article. Besides, you can't use User images on Mainspace articles. - J.P.Talk 16:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
FURST
--Neil2250 23:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
gj
It's good to see someone is still level-headed. — Why 21:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers Why. I just tried to keep the argument at bay till an admin could intervene. Thanks for sorting it, btw. Shadow Runner 21:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Rawr.
Want some updates on the renders since your making a new page?, my old render is disgusting considering what i can now do :P--Neil2250 15:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- That would be excellent Neil. If you look at my sandbox you can see how each page will be formatted, so the image would need to fit neatly in there. My character render would go on my game portal page. Shadow Runner 15:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
A presy for you :)
This user has successfuly enraged user Naty, on the Wiki!! |
thoght it would make you smile :) --Nick123 17:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- It did make me smile, though it wasn't my objective at all. Shadow Runner 17:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- he is making a new one :P--Nataliexxx 17:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- let me just make a better one :)
- he is making a new one :P--Nataliexxx 17:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
This user has successfuly enraged user Naty, on the Wiki!! |
now that better :) --Nick123 17:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- You stole MY SUBCAT!--Neil2250 18:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- haha he asked to be stolen :) he purred at me... --Nick123 18:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Chucks Watermelon at Nick*--Neil2250 19:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- haha he asked to be stolen :) he purred at me... --Nick123 18:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- You stole MY SUBCAT!--Neil2250 18:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop undoing my changes
Hi, I am responsible for the Polish version of GW and was asked to fix some bugs. You ARE NOT helping me, by undoing the changes. Please stop. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Ryslaw (talk).
- I'll just assume good faith on the matter then. Apologies for interrupting, and welcome to the wiki! Shadow Runner 12:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
So..
Slap, slap, slapslapslap, double slap, crit slap, BAMPH! slap, KO!!!!! -- Cyan 11:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
PERMISSION!
Permission to use your logo's, reversed and normal for my page or signature, am I allowed :O? Haunted Shadow10:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- I spent a fair bit of time making them, so yes you can use them but make sure you credit them back to me. Shadow Runner 10:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Show Prewiev
When I'm editing I'm afraid of using "Show Previev" button, cuz it's like the page dissapear after having used it. I'll promice to make some tests before I seriously wan't to edit and save a page. I agree, and it's ambarrasing to let all small changes be saved in the log. But, lol you almost force others to take a look at the page then. Some may get angry. I know. Will try to behave when editing now. Meny thanks!--Kram 12:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's general etiquette to not clog up the recent changes by using show preview, so any attempts to increase the usage of it is appreciated! Just to inform you, when replying to a comment on your talk page, it's often best to reply on your own talk page to avoid the discussion being on several pages. Also, it's common practice to leave messages at the bottom of a talk page! Shadow Runner 12:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- If you're afraid of losing your changes when you hit show preview, why not select all, copy, and then press show preview? That way, if you lose the preview page, you can just paste it back in a new page. — Why 12:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Get back on msn imo --neshot. moo. 22:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
LEGIT FIRST.----Sorry about how the admin run turned out. No hard feelings right? :D The Emmisary 20:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- None at all, I was just disappointed with some of the reactions to an RfA, and pulled the plug. Shadow Runner 20:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't take it personally. Adminship is overrated since once people get it they tend not to do shit. There are a few exceptions to that of course and I'm sure you would have been one. The Emmisary 20:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I would have hoped so, but the situation will not arise for now. Shadow Runner 21:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I won't take that personally either about that admin opinion, Emmisary. :P
- Seriously, Shadow, not everyone is going to have a flawless RfA and without going overboard, good points can seem harsh to the one being voted upon. Forget about it and keep up the solid contribs. Almost every reconfirm or RfA is a popularity or suspected popularity contest now. The good ole days when you were voted to into adminship because you were trusted, proved yourself, and knew your stuff...miss you good ole days <3 — Gares 21:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Which is why I withdrew. If I ever make admin, I'd not want it to be by popularity which seems unlikely, hence withdrawal. I'll just contribute however I can, and make best without the sysop tools ;) Shadow Runner 21:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- "By popularity" isn't of itself a bad thing. You need some popularity to become an admin because you need people who know or know of you (and thus have a sense of trust in you) to support you. The type of popularity you should avoid, though, is the cult-of-personality type. --Riddle 21:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I also considered some of the points made when I withdrew (more of a reason then my dislike in the reaction, tbh). I'll likely RfA in the future, however. Shadow Runner 21:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I do agree with emmisary that adminship is over rated, especially on an wiki for an old online game that is slowly dying. It's not something I'd want to do, but it appears that it is something that is needed for the good of the wiki. I still think that you'd make a good admin. Just give it several more months. I'll still support you in the future for another RfA unless you screwup somehow. We still have 3 quite active sysops so that should keep us going for now. --Lania 22:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ya, there's always another time. I do believe you'd be a good admin, though I didn't get to vote in time. And yeah, screw the popularity contests. I share the sentiment, even though I seem to have passed one. — Why 22:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I do agree with emmisary that adminship is over rated, especially on an wiki for an old online game that is slowly dying. It's not something I'd want to do, but it appears that it is something that is needed for the good of the wiki. I still think that you'd make a good admin. Just give it several more months. I'll still support you in the future for another RfA unless you screwup somehow. We still have 3 quite active sysops so that should keep us going for now. --Lania 22:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I also considered some of the points made when I withdrew (more of a reason then my dislike in the reaction, tbh). I'll likely RfA in the future, however. Shadow Runner 21:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- "By popularity" isn't of itself a bad thing. You need some popularity to become an admin because you need people who know or know of you (and thus have a sense of trust in you) to support you. The type of popularity you should avoid, though, is the cult-of-personality type. --Riddle 21:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Which is why I withdrew. If I ever make admin, I'd not want it to be by popularity which seems unlikely, hence withdrawal. I'll just contribute however I can, and make best without the sysop tools ;) Shadow Runner 21:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I would have hoped so, but the situation will not arise for now. Shadow Runner 21:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't take it personally. Adminship is overrated since once people get it they tend not to do shit. There are a few exceptions to that of course and I'm sure you would have been one. The Emmisary 20:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
(Reset indent) I think I have won every single election type thing that I have purely on the basis of popularity, but I also believe that I make a good bureaucrat/administrator so I don't really care. Don't let the system get you down dog, just do what you think is right and damn the rest. If the world disagrees with you and your actions, they will let you know. Misery 15:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Misery, I disagree with your spelling of dog in that post. — Gares 16:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Tough luck dog. Misery 16:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
It got got even worse when the internet was created
The most humoristic thing about that quote is that it is true. Koda Kumi 15:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Okey dokey, thanks for the warning. Can you please tell me how to delete it? --G 21:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've tagged it to be deleted by an admin, so it'll be deleted when they get round to it. ShadowRunner 21:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
First
No clean page for you.--Neil2250 14:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Second
so im all reading rules and stuffs, also, i blew something up on transformice.i filled a box with balls. put baloons on the top. waiting 30 seconds, Anti-mouse astroid incoming.--Neil2250 15:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, I should really fix that loophole, but the box is nice and aligned. ShadowRunner 15:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
ohshit
wish me luck and stuff --ne shot. 08:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
IP is right IMO
the IP is hiding inappropriate content while we wait for admins to block and protect the file. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 19:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)