Feedback talk:Game updates/20150122

Why?

Why did they add a 10 second recharge to minipets? talk 04:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Why did they even add a cooldown to Ghost in the box? Was that overpowered? :D --Ooola (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for adding something that is so fucking retarded. Now no one is willing to buy Ghost in the Boxes or the value of them will be greatly reduced. Batchie (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

"When the ghost disappears, it triggers the energy gain of a necromancer's Soul Reaping attribute. It also triggers Edge of Extinction's damage on ghosts." Could be why? I don't rly know xd Stav (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Utter madness. Why waste time on this when there are campaign continuation bugs still around? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.180.166.26 (talk) at 13:18, 23 January 2015‎ (UTC).

If folk were using Ghosts in Boxes in the UW for eoe then that does rather sound like the reason stav... Although surely it would be better to make the ghosts in boxes outpost only. -Chieftain Alex 18:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Chieftain +1. Make them outpost only like some other consumables. Batchie (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Spamming Minipets or Ghost in the Boxes basically made the AI stupid. They didn't use any skills anymore. Was fun while it lasted, but I think banning people for that was stupid. But at least a few more potential buyers for GW2 and the upcoming extension. Hooray ANet! - the company that hates their own customers/fans. --178.3.21.169 20:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

What you referred to as "banning people for spamming festive items or minipets" is not anyhow related to the actual reason of why they were blocked. Just FYI. Dmitri Fatkin (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't touch GW2 even with someone else's money. Terrible game is Terrible. --136.142.214.19 20:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)